hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Gray" <jl...@streamy.com>
Subject RE: Thrift API vs Java API
Date Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:07:14 GMT
I have not used the thrift interface, but know that many others are.  I
doubt that they are seeing an order of magnitude decrease in performance.
What have others seen with thrift?

There are talks of a new client-side API.  To my knowledge no one is working
on this, so it is not currently scheduled for any upcoming release.  There
are a number of people who would be interested in it, so please continue
discussion on the issue if you have an interest in it.

Here is the open issue regarding this (Pure C/C++ client libraries):


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Slava Gorelik [mailto:slava.gorelik@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:12 AM
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Thrift API vs Java API
> Hi.Currently i'm trying to communicate with Hbase from .NET environment
> and
> the only option that i have is Thrift.
> I did small comparison (execution time) between Java and Thrift (adding
> 1000
> rows with 1k data) and Java is 3.4 ms (average) vs. Thrift that is 44
> ms
> average.
> It seems that Thrift option is not usable from performance aspect.
> Now he question : some one tried to implement Hbase client side in C++
> /
> .NET ?  Is it feasible ?
> Best Regards.

View raw message