Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 32485 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2008 16:36:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2008 16:36:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 80693 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2008 16:36:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80343 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2008 16:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hbase-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80332 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2008 16:36:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:36:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jlist@streamy.com designates 72.34.249.3 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.34.249.3] (HELO mail.streamy.com) (72.34.249.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:34:45 +0000 Received: from jg (static-98-112-71-211.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [98.112.71.211]) by ns1.streamy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mAPGYUgm008034 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:34:30 -0800 From: "Jonathan Gray" To: References: <92c4d8c10811240956kaa3ab87w94dfa25a3b36e757@mail.gmail.com> <492AF03D.8040201@duboce.net> <92c4d8c10811250314n3b15a257yd2913714c8d13399@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <92c4d8c10811250314n3b15a257yd2913714c8d13399@mail.gmail.com> Subject: RE: improvements in 0.18? Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:33:35 -0800 Message-ID: <200a01c94f1b$8fe91be0$afbb53a0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AclO7w9xxZ7TSy6wR6Ktl7SS7He1/AALC7KA Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As of right now, thanks to Andrew Purtell, such a thing is possible: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1004 Hadoop 0.19 was just released yesterday, so no longer required to use an RC or branch checkout of hadoop on hbase trunk. JG > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Sell [mailto:trsell@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 3:14 AM > To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: improvements in 0.18? > > Oh yes. the changelog.. > I'd love to be using hbase 0.19.0 when it's out, but we're being > conservative about hadoop upgrades. I assume it's not possible to > compile > hbase 0.19.0 with hadoop 0.18.2? > > thanks > ~Tim. > > 2008/11/24 stack > > > Handling of binary keys, an experimental transactional hbase and a > bunch of > > critical bug fixes is the short answer. For more detail, you'll have > to > > read the CHANGES.txt (thats that I just did -- smile). > > > > If you can, wait on 0.19.0 hbase, a week or two more I'd say, it'll > have > > performance improvements that you'd likely be interested in. > > > > Good on you Tim, > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > Tim Sell wrote: > > > >> I haven't been following the progress as much as I'd like. > >> We're using hbase 0.2.1 at the moment, and wondering what are the > major > >> improvements in 0.18? > >> Is the better batching of bulk row updates included? Does that cover > when > >> using map reduce as input/output as well? Has there been any major > bug fix > >> / > >> stability improvements? Just after a quick overview really. I really > >> should > >> read the jira's more often. > >> > >> ~Tim S. > >> > >> > >> > > > >