Mailing-List: contact hbase-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daniel.leffel@gmail.com
 designates 72.14.220.156 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=VfFAAZgU23+/Z2udk5QSBeQZDiwTIAHnF1PeBJXbgm7aK5RwzA2+0yTQatXo264x9B
         hmOqC5HV1F439khMTWZ13ZYnj7kZrfbV6vAHOD3dofW54uL+q8tS0JBHUrodex5PI7U8
         tkG6VnpY6oDOH/Gv7hbW+8LM6G9hBmy6Nop18=
Message-ID: <25e5a0c00807021926m3c5f2be8je5ce9111e07bc8c7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:26:46 -0700
From: "Daniel Leffel" <daniel.leffel@gmail.com>
To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: In Memory Column Families
In-Reply-To: 
 <84E2AE771361E9419DD0EFBD31F09C4D4F60BB757E@EXVMBX015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_17956_4826491.1215052006578"
References: <25e5a0c00807021919i20a5163q7dad79f0ccebd26d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <84E2AE771361E9419DD0EFBD31F09C4D4F60BB757E@EXVMBX015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net>

------=_Part_17956_4826491.1215052006578
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Oh. That's would explain it. :-)

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jim Kellerman <jim@powerset.com> wrote:

> Because in memory is not implemented?
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Leffel [mailto:daniel.leffel@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:19 PM
> > To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> > Subject: In Memory Column Families
> >
> > Hi all,
> > Quick question. I created a new column family (one created
> > using IN_MEMORY).
> > I expected iterating with a scanner to be much faster, but
> > alas, it seems to operate at speeds comparable to regular
> > column families. I have verified that in_memory=true on the
> > column family. Why isn't this substantially faster?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Danny
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 8.0.135 / Virus Database: 270.4.4/1531 - Release
> > Date: 7/2/2008 7:02 PM
> >
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.135 / Virus Database: 270.4.4/1531 - Release Date: 7/2/2008
> 7:02 PM
>

------=_Part_17956_4826491.1215052006578--