hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Leffel" <daniel.lef...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: In Memory Column Families
Date Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:26:46 GMT
Oh. That's would explain it. :-)

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jim Kellerman <jim@powerset.com> wrote:

> Because in memory is not implemented?
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Leffel [mailto:daniel.leffel@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:19 PM
> > To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> > Subject: In Memory Column Families
> >
> > Hi all,
> > Quick question. I created a new column family (one created
> > using IN_MEMORY).
> > I expected iterating with a scanner to be much faster, but
> > alas, it seems to operate at speeds comparable to regular
> > column families. I have verified that in_memory=true on the
> > column family. Why isn't this substantially faster?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Danny
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 8.0.135 / Virus Database: 270.4.4/1531 - Release
> > Date: 7/2/2008 7:02 PM
> >
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.135 / Virus Database: 270.4.4/1531 - Release Date: 7/2/2008
> 7:02 PM
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message