hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Clint Morgan" <clint....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
Date Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:51:10 GMT
We use getRow() everytime we want a single row (we almost always want
multiple columns).

We're running a patched version of TRUNK with light development usage,
and have not seen any issues.

So getRow() is important for us, but we won't use 0.1 so won't pollute
the vote...
-clint

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Jim Kellerman <jim@powerset.com> wrote:
> +- 0:
>
> HBASE-673 is unresolved. Question (to the community): How important is HTable.getRow
? If not so much, then we can move 673 to a future release or make it wontfix for hbase-0.1.x.
>
> If it is important to you, please vote -1.
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:02 PM
>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
>>
>> I've put up the first release candidate for hbase 0.1.3 here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-1/
>>
>> (Candidates used to be zero-based.  Lets make them 1-based
>> from here on out.  Its less confusing.)
>>
>> 0.1.3 fixes a couple of critical bugs.  Please try it out ---
>> run it, review documentation, etc. -- and let us know if any
>> issues with this new version.
>>
>> Lets close the voting on release, Thursday, June 12th.
>>
>> To be clear, hbase 0.1.x versions require hadoop 0.16.x.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
>> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>

Mime
View raw message