Mailing-List: contact hbase-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Ankur.Goel@corp.aol.com
 designates 64.236.137.25 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release hbase 0.1.0 (Candidate 0)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:55:22 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <8F11722A0562BB4F80A680ED4CFED0D501CEE249@EVSBNG02.ad.office.aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <1F841D5C-5F65-4689-8C86-CE330D2DC530@rapleaf.com>
Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release hbase 0.1.0 (Candidate 0)
Thread-Index: AciLf0fGwGUtBiRcQNeZL7UMlr1aIwB8Apwg
From: "Goel, Ankur" <Ankur.Goel@corp.aol.com>
To: <hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org>

+1 for marking all below as blockers=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Duxbury [mailto:bryan@rapleaf.com]=20
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 11:43 PM
To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hbase 0.1.0 (Candidate 0)

Agree, let's make all the below blockers.

-Bryan

On Mar 21, 2008, at 11:04 AM, stack wrote:

> -1 on RC.  IMO, all below are blockers for 0.1.  On 534, we should at=20
> least make it so a region keeps going if it turns out it has dangling=20
> references to a parent since removed so no need of a restart.
> St.Ack
>
>
> Jim Kellerman wrote:
>> There has been some negative feedback on the release candidate.
>>
>> What I'd like people to do is vote on the following issues.
>> Are they blockers (+1 if they are a blocker, -1 if not)?
>>
>> HBASE-527 RegexpRowFilter does not work when there are columns =20
>> from multiple families.
>>
>> HBASE-476 RegexpRowFilter behaves incorectly when there are =20
>> multiple store files (is this still an issue in the release =20
>> candidate?)
>>
>> HBASE-537 HBase no longer waits for hdfs to exit safe mode
>>
>> HBASE-534 Stores retaining references to long-deleted mapfiles
>>
>> Others?
>>
>> If you feel strongly about these issues and that they must block the
>> 0.1.0 release, vote +1. If a fix could wait for 0.1.1 please vote -1.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> ---
>> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>>
>>>> But -1 because I'd like to see filters work (HBASE-527)
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> -clint
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:07 PM, edward yoon
>>>>
>>> <edward@udanax.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>>  This is a first release of a hbase.
>>>>>  A hql package should be removed before release.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Someday it will be gone, Do it now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On 3/21/08, stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>  > I've created an hbase 0.1.0 release candidate.  Please
>>>>>
>>> download
>>>
>>>>> and try  > it out:
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.0-candidate-0/
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  > Does it work for you?  Do unit tests pass on your
>>>>>
>>> hardware?  Is
>>>
>>>>> the  > documentation sufficient?
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  > Should we release this?  Vote closes on Monday, March 24.
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  > Thanks,
>>>>>  > St.Ack
>>>>>  >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>>  B. Regards,
>>>>>  Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> B. Regards,
>>> Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG.
>>> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release
>>> Date: 3/19/2008 9:54 AM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release Date: =20
>> 3/19/2008 9:54 AM
>>
>>
>