Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1003200D6A for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 02:47:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CF29E160C26; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 20B21160C14 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 02:47:03 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 49184 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2017 01:47:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 49171 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2017 01:47:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9D9C91A0AF4 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RJT4nklWS46T for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 251ED5F2EE for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 59750E0D89 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 12A7227405 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Guanghao Zhang (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19522) The complete order may be wrong in AsyncBufferedMutatorImpl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:47:05 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16293548#comment-16293548 ] Guanghao Zhang commented on HBASE-19522: ---------------------------------------- Add a new ut in 002 patch. > The complete order may be wrong in AsyncBufferedMutatorImpl > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-19522 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19522 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Guanghao Zhang > Assignee: Guanghao Zhang > Attachments: HBASE-19522.master.001.patch, HBASE-19522.master.002.patch > > > {code} > List> toComplete = this.futures; > assert toSend.size() == toComplete.size(); > this.mutations = new ArrayList<>(); > this.futures = new ArrayList<>(); > bufferedSize = 0L; > Iterator> toCompleteIter = toComplete.iterator(); > for (CompletableFuture future : table.batch(toSend)) { > future.whenComplete((r, e) -> { > CompletableFuture f = toCompleteIter.next(); // Call next in callback, so the complete order may different with the future order > if (e != null) { > f.completeExceptionally(e); > } else { > f.complete(null); > } > }); > } > {code} > Here we call table.batch to get a list of CompleteFuture for each mutation. Then we register a call back for each future. But the problem is we call toCompleteIter.next() in the callback. So we may complete the future by a wrong order(not same with the mutation order). Meanwhile, as ArrayList is not thread safe, so different thread may get same future by toCompleteIter.next(). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)