hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19170) [hbase-thirdparty] Change the relocation offset of shaded artifacts
Date Mon, 13 Nov 2017 23:12:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16250468#comment-16250468
] 

stack commented on HBASE-19170:
-------------------------------

bq. oh yes please. Jetty should not be done here. I presumed stack meant over on HBASE-18943

Yeah, or in a new third-party issue.

> [hbase-thirdparty] Change the relocation offset of shaded artifacts
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19170
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: thirdparty-1.0.1
>            Reporter: Jerry He
>            Assignee: Mike Drob
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1, thirdparty-1.0.2
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-19170.patch, HBASE-19170.v2.patch
>
>
> On the dev@hbase list, we conclude that we need to change the relocation offset in hbase-thirdparty
to avoid shading conflicts with the other hbase shaded components (hbase-shaded-client and
hbase-shaded-mapreduce components).
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1aa5d1d7f6d176df49e72096926b011cafe1315932515346d06e8342@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E
> The suggestion is to use "o.a.h.hbase.thirdparty" in hbase-thirdparty to differentiate
between "shaded" for downstream of us vs "thirdparty" for our internal use.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message