hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Drob (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19170) [hbase-thirdparty] Change the relocation offset of shaded artifacts
Date Tue, 07 Nov 2017 22:32:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16243039#comment-16243039

Mike Drob commented on HBASE-19170:

bq. Should it be o.a.hbase.thirdparty instead of o.a.hadoop.hbase.thirdparty
probably. will fix.

bq. You going to make an RC?
I want to take a try at HBASE-18855 first

> [hbase-thirdparty] Change the relocation offset of shaded artifacts
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-19170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19170
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: thirdparty-1.0.1
>            Reporter: Jerry He
>            Assignee: Mike Drob
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1, thirdparty-1.0.2
>         Attachments: HBASE-19170.patch
> On the dev@hbase list, we conclude that we need to change the relocation offset in hbase-thirdparty
to avoid shading conflicts with the other hbase shaded components (hbase-shaded-client and
hbase-shaded-mapreduce components).
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1aa5d1d7f6d176df49e72096926b011cafe1315932515346d06e8342@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E
> The suggestion is to use "o.a.h.hbase.thirdparty" in hbase-thirdparty to differentiate
between "shaded" for downstream of us vs "thirdparty" for our internal use.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message