hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chia-Ping Tsai (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18994) Decide if META/System tables should use Compacting Memstore or Default Memstore
Date Wed, 25 Oct 2017 06:27:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16218164#comment-16218164
] 

Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18994:
----------------------------------------

bq. We might not have to add this in hbase-default.xml I believe. If we have a section for
compacting memstore in book, we can add abt this new config there.
ok
bq. We allow this? I feel we should NOT allow users to add their tables to System.
IIRC, use can do this. And we can't forbid it now as that will break the BC...

> Decide if META/System tables should use Compacting Memstore or Default Memstore
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18994
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-18994.patch, HBASE-18994_1.patch, HBASE-18994_2.patch, HBASE-18994_3.patch
>
>
> HBASE-18992 brought this topic. Currently META is also using Compacting Memstore. We
should decide if system tables can go with Default memstore only.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message