hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chia-Ping Tsai (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-18994) Decide if META/System tables should use Compacting Memstore or Default Memstore
Date Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:01:10 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16207913#comment-16207913
] 

Chia-Ping Tsai edited comment on HBASE-18994 at 10/17/17 5:00 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

bq. Can we just assign Default Memstore for all the system tables?
That simplifies the issue but it doesn't bring any reason. Perhaps someone will raise another
issue about "all system tables should be assigned to compacting memstore". As i see it, a
workaround is to make it configurable, and the default memstore is the default setting.


was (Author: chia7712):
bq. Can we just assign Default Memstore for all the system tables?
That simplifies the issue but it doesn't bring any reason. Perhaps someone will raise another
issue about "all system tables should be assigned to compacting memstore". As i see it, a
workaround is to make it configurable.

> Decide if META/System tables should use Compacting Memstore or Default Memstore
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18994
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
>
> HBASE-18992 brought this topic. Currently META is also using Compacting Memstore. We
should decide if system tables can go with Default memstore only.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message