hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18941) Confusing logging error around rerun of restore on an existing table.
Date Wed, 04 Oct 2017 17:58:01 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16191715#comment-16191715
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18941:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 19s{color} | {color:blue}
Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color}
| {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color} |
{color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  0s{color} | {color:red}
The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests
are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this
patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 40s{color}
| {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 18s{color} |
{color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 13s{color}
| {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 15s{color}
| {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 28s{color}
| {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts. {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m 31s{color} |
{color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 12s{color} |
{color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 17s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 18s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 18s{color} | {color:green}
the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 11s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 15s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color}
| {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m  0s{color}
| {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts. {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 36m 57s{color}
| {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5
2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 or 3.0.0-alpha4. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m 37s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 12s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  8m 23s{color} | {color:green}
hbase-backup in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m  8s{color}
| {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 57m  6s{color} | {color:black}
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:5d60123 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-18941 |
| JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12890389/HBASE-18941.patch
|
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  shadedjars  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  hadoopcheck  hbaseanti
 checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux f043e6e8d81a 3.13.0-119-generic #166-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 3 12:18:55 UTC 2017
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | master / 11aa674 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_144 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC3 |
|  Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8940/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8940/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Confusing logging error around rerun of restore on an existing table.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18941
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18941
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Amit Kabra
>            Assignee: Amit Kabra
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-18941.patch
>
>
> On executing restore command on already existing table
> {code}./hbase restore hdfs://localhost:8020/test/ backup_1506352287382 -t test1 -m test1_restore_incremental{code}
> Output
> ======
> 2017-09-25 20:46:44,624 ERROR [main] impl.RestoreTablesClient: Existing table ([test1_restore_incremental])
found in the restore target, please add "-overwrite" option in the command if you mean to
restore to these existing tables
> java.io.IOException: Existing table found in target while no "-overwrite" option found
> But when we run the restore command again with the -overwrite option it gives error
> {code}./hbase restore hdfs://localhost:8020/test/ backup_1506352287382 -t test1 -m test1_restore_incremental
-overwrite{code}
> Error when parsing command-line arguments: Unrecognized option: -overwrite



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message