Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C05200CFC for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:27:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A29DB1609B4; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E6EFA1609CD for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:27:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 26363 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2017 17:27:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 26328 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2017 17:27:10 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7C2481807EB for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.502 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.502 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w214SLBbvW8G for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id E63DE5FE43 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 18068E0EE9 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A23A6242B7 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mike Drob (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18883) Upgrade to Curator 4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:27:14 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16184514#comment-16184514 ] Mike Drob commented on HBASE-18883: ----------------------------------- Thinking out loud here - the tests I've run so far have only been HDFS + HBase and I haven't seen conflict there. But theoretically, we can have users running MR jobs and needing their own version of curator included. So we probably do want to proactively shade/relocate here? > Upgrade to Curator 4.0 > ---------------------- > > Key: HBASE-18883 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18883 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Client > Reporter: Mike Drob > Assignee: Mike Drob > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-18883.patch, HBASE-18883.v2.patch > > > While we're doing a dependency pass for HBase 2, we should see if we can bump Curator to 4.0 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)