Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C8B200D0B for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 23:33:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A74351609C1; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 027F31609CA for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 23:33:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 75490 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2017 21:33:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 75477 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2017 21:33:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 88CA21A532A for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LfgZ_8XlO-8x for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id A468961032 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 79A46E256A for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7FF9F242DF for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sean Busbey (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18626) Handle the incompatible change about the replication TableCFs' config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:33:06 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated HBASE-18626: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-beta-1) 2.0.0-beta-2 let's push rolling upgrade stuff to beta-2. Ability to do upgrade at all should be sufficient for beta-1. > Handle the incompatible change about the replication TableCFs' config > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-18626 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18626 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Guanghao Zhang > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2 > > > About compatibility, there is one incompatible change about the replication TableCFs' config. The old config is a string and it concatenate the list of tables and column families in format "table1:cf1,cf2;table2:cfA,cfB" in zookeeper for table-cf to replication peer mapping. When parse the config, it use ":" to split the string. If table name includes namespace, it will be wrong (See HBASE-11386). It is a problem since we support namespace (0.98). So HBASE-11393 (and HBASE-16653) changed it to a PB object. When rolling update cluster, you need rolling master first. And the master will try to translate the string config to a PB object. But there are two problems. > 1. Permission problem. The replication client can write the zookeeper directly. So the znode may have different owner. And master may don't have the write permission for the znode. It maybe failed to translate old table-cfs string to new PB Object. See HBASE-16938 > 2. We usually keep compatibility between old client and new server. But the old replication client may write a string config to znode directly. Then the new server can't parse them. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)