Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46F5200CFE for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:02:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A310B160C9B; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DF4811609E4 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:02:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 18889 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2017 07:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 18878 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2017 07:02:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 07:02:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4DD561A75EE for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:02:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -98.702 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.702 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DuKDClSAftLy for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id C512761285 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7274FE0E6E for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 77F3A24172 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "xinxin fan (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16894) Create more than 1 split per region, generalize HBASE-12590 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 07:02:14 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16158204#comment-16158204 ] xinxin fan edited comment on HBASE-16894 at 9/8/17 7:01 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Creating splits per region for live table will not face the parallel region opening issue, because the table scan doesn't need to open regions parallelly at client side. it's different with snapshot. was (Author: xinxin fan): Creating splits per region for live table will not face the parallel region opening issue, because the table scan doesn't need to open region. it's different with snapshot. > Create more than 1 split per region, generalize HBASE-12590 > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-16894 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16894 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Enis Soztutar > Assignee: Yi Liang > Attachments: ImplementaionAndSomeQuestion.docx > > > A common request from users is to be able to better control how many map tasks are created per region. Right now, it is always 1 region = 1 input split = 1 map task. Same goes for Spark since it uses the TIF. With region sizes as large as 50 GBs, it is desirable to be able to create more than 1 split per region. > HBASE-12590 adds a config property for MR jobs to be able to handle skew in region sizes. The algorithm is roughly: > {code} > If (region size >= average size*ratio) : cut the region into two MR input splits > If (average size <= region size < average size*ratio) : one region as one MR input split > If (sum of several continuous regions size < average size * ratio): combine these regions into one MR input split. > {code} > Although we can set data skew ratio to be 0.5 or something to abuse HBASE-12590 into creating more than 1 split task per region, it is not ideal. But there is no way to create more with the patch as it is. For example we cannot create more than 2 tasks per region. > If we want to fix this properly, we should extend the approach in HBASE-12590, and make it so that the client can specify the desired num of mappers, or desired split size, and the TIF generates the splits based on the current region sizes very similar to the algorithm in HBASE-12590, but a more generic way. This also would eliminate the hand tuning of data skew ratio. > We also can think about the guidepost approach that Phoenix has in the stats table which is used for exactly this purpose. Right now, the region can be split into powers of two assuming uniform distribution within the region. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)