hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18853) hbase-protocol-shaded includes protobuf (since we moved to hbase-thirdparty)
Date Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:54:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16173749#comment-16173749

Hudson commented on HBASE-18853:

FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-2.0 #547 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-2.0/547/])
HBASE-18853 hbase-protocol-shaded includes protobuf (since we moved to (stack: rev 76199a338dde5a0962a4b206d99a9baa371f9829)
* (edit) hbase-protocol-shaded/pom.xml

> hbase-protocol-shaded includes protobuf (since we moved to hbase-thirdparty)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-18853
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18853
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: thirdparty
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>         Attachments: HBASE-18853.master.001.patch, HBASE-18853.master.002.patch
> I didn't follow my own comment when I added hbase-thirdparty hbase-shaded-protobuf to
hbase-shaded-protocol as a dependency instead of original protobuf. It meant that our jar
had protobuf bundled up inside it.
> Change is small, and I don't think we were actually using the non-shaded protobuf anywhere,
but if anyone was, it'd make for interesting issue to debug. Let me see if it breaks anything...
> (Found by our [~vickyuec] on internal deploy...)

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message