hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anoop Sam John (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18753) Introduce the unsynchronized TimeRangeTracker
Date Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:54:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16157228#comment-16157228

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18753:

We dont need a Sync TR here.  This is Immutable segment.  
Now we have Sync and Non sync versions of TR, we can not have a TR state in Segment. We can
have super type only here.   Or may be this need change in the Segment hierarchy also !! 
Am ok to do this as a follow up
Why name this way? NON_SYNC?  That is not correct name?
bq.getTimeRangeTracker(final byte [] timeRangeTrackerBytes)
This can make a non sync version of TR right?

> Introduce the unsynchronized TimeRangeTracker
> ---------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-18753
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18753
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>            Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-3
>         Attachments: HBASE-18753.v0.patch
> If HBASE-18752 is pushed, it will be better to introduce the unsync TimeRangeTracker
for reducing the cost of recalculation.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message