Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35120200CF5 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 21:09:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 31EC9164DED; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A17D164DEF for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 21:09:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 44552 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2017 19:09:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 44540 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2017 19:09:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1E4B118041D for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8845O-VIiihl for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2E08D5FE2E for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0602EE0D92 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2C386218F3 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-15042) refactor so that site materials are in the Standard Maven Place MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:09:06 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124681#comment-16124681 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-15042 at 8/12/17 7:08 PM: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I eventually had to stop copying back doc updates from master branch for 0.98 releases. I forget what broke them exactly. I think a skinning change that relied on alpha-this or beta-that maven subcomponents. We had to build with JDK6 for 0.98 and the maven binaries were incompatible at the bytecode level. If we do LTS with 1.1 on JDK7 sooner or later that can happen again. Unless there is a change in doc relevant for 1.1 I don't think it necessary to further update them on branch. We probably should update how to contribute sections in our book (for patches and doc) to call out that changes to be applied to branches which also have doc updates need the doc updates ported back. (As opposed to relying on naive copy of master docs back to branch for update.) was (Author: apurtell): I eventually had to stop copying back doc updates from master branch for 0.98 releases. I forget what broke them exactly. I think a skinning change that relied on alpha-this or beta-that maven subcomponents. Unless there is a change in doc relevant for 1.1 I don't think it necessary to further update them on branch. We probably should update how to contribute sections in our book (for patches and doc) to call out that changes to be applied to branches which also have doc updates need the doc updates ported back. (As opposed to relying on naive copy of master docs back to branch for update.) > refactor so that site materials are in the Standard Maven Place > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-15042 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15042 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Task > Components: build, website > Reporter: Sean Busbey > Assignee: Jan Hentschel > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-15042.master.001.patch, HBASE-15042.master.002.patch, HBASE-15042.master.002.patch, HBASE-15042.master.003.patch > > > for some reason we currently have our site materials in {{src/main/site}} rather than the maven prescribed {{src/site}}. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)