hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Abhishek Singh Chouhan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18476) HTable#put should call RS#mutate rather than RS#multi
Date Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:20:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16106400#comment-16106400

Abhishek Singh Chouhan commented on HBASE-18476:

Out of curosity, was there any particular reason of using the multi path rather than mutate?
 In the current implementation calling a put would also flush any existing commits in BM for
that table, is this something that was intended (changing to mutate would change this behavior)?

> HTable#put should call RS#mutate rather than RS#multi
> -----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-18476
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18476
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>            Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.5.0, 2.0.0-alpha-2
> The HBASE-18374 separates the metric for a single put and batched puts so the HTable#put
shouldn't use the RS#mulit. It messes up the metrics.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message