hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Karan Mehta (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-18228) HBCK improvements
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2017 16:09:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16076809#comment-16076809
] 

Karan Mehta edited comment on HBASE-18228 at 7/6/17 4:08 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

[~mdrob] [~tedyu@apache.org]
Can you provide some feedback on my reply on review board?


was (Author: karanmehta93):
[~mdrob]
Can you provide some feedback on my reply on review board?

> HBCK improvements
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18228
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: hbck
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Assignee: Karan Mehta
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-18228.branch-1.3.patch
>
>
> We just had a prod issue and running HBCK the way we did actually causes more problems.
> In part HBCK did stuff we did not expect, in part we had little visibility into what
HBCK was doing, and in part the logging was confusing.
> I'm proposing 2 improvements:
> 1. A dry-run mode. Run, and just list what would have been done.
> 2. An interactive mode. Run, and for each action request Y/N user input. So that a user
can opt-out of stuff.
> [~jmhsieh], FYI



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message