hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18240) Add hbase-thirdparty, a project with hbase utility including an hbase-shaded-thirdparty module with guava, netty, etc.
Date Fri, 23 Jun 2017 06:24:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16060461#comment-16060461
] 

stack commented on HBASE-18240:
-------------------------------

Pushed new patch on hbase-thirdparty. hbase-thirdparty has guava, gson, netty, and protobuf-util
but not protobuf itself. Compiling the fat patched jar that included protobuf and guava and
netty, etc., failed; dependencies of guava (errorprone) and netty src are not available so
the compile fails. Will leave the production of the protobuf as is in hbase-protocol-shaded
for now.  Will come back and experiment with a multi-module build under hbase-thirdparty later;
one module will do protobuf patching and then next module will do the shade of it all -- no
compile.

> Add hbase-thirdparty, a project with hbase utility including an hbase-shaded-thirdparty
module with guava, netty, etc.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18240
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18240
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: dependencies
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-18240.master.001.patch, hbase-auxillary.tgz
>
>
> This issue is about adding a new related project to host hbase auxillary utility. In
this new project, the first thing we'd add is a module to host shaded versions of third party
libraries.
> This task comes of discussion held here http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-More-Shading-td4083025.html
where one conclusion of the DISCUSSION was "... pushing this part forward with some code is
the next logical step. Seems to be consensus about taking our known internal dependencies
and performing this shade magic."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message