hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guanghao Zhang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18170) Refactor ReplicationSourceWALReaderThread
Date Sat, 17 Jun 2017 06:25:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16052716#comment-16052716

Guanghao Zhang commented on HBASE-18170:

Attach a 005 patch which addressed [~stack]'s comments.

bq.  no need of the Thread suffix I'd say
Great. Remove it in 005 patch. Thanks.

> Refactor ReplicationSourceWALReaderThread
> -----------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-18170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18170
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Guanghao Zhang
>            Assignee: Guanghao Zhang
>         Attachments: HBASE-18170.master.001.patch, HBASE-18170.master.001.patch, HBASE-18170.master.002.patch,
HBASE-18170.master.002.patch, HBASE-18170.master.003.patch, HBASE-18170.master.004.patch,
> HBASE-18130 add some get* method to ReplicationSource. So ReplicationSourceWALReaderThread
doesn't need so many parameter to initialize. And the WALEntryFilter only used by ReplicationSourceWALReaderThread,
so we don't need to new it for every ReplicationSourceWALReaderThread. Meanwhile, we can separate
a new RecoveredReplicationSourceWALReaderThread for recovered replication source. Thanks.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message