Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9936200C8E for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 06:10:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B8152160BD0; Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A510160BB6 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 06:10:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 51891 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2017 04:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 51880 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2017 04:10:08 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4D9FDC4423 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.201 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RnGdkLeOyCO3 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 202735FCCD for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1D97BE0D95 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6181221B60 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18099) FlushSnapshotSubprocedure should check the return value from Region#flush() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 25 May 2017 04:10:09 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-18099: --------------------------- Priority: Critical (was: Major) > FlushSnapshotSubprocedure should check the return value from Region#flush() > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-18099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18099 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ted Yu > Priority: Critical > Attachments: 18099.v1.txt, 18099.v2.txt, 18099.v3.txt, 18099.v4.txt > > > In the following thread: > http://search-hadoop.com/m/HBase/YGbbMXkeHlI9zo > Jacob described the scenario where data from certain region were missing in the snapshot. > Here was related region server log: > https://pastebin.com/1ECXjhRp > He pointed out that concurrent flush from MemStoreFlusher.1 thread was not initiated from the thread pool for snapshot. > In RegionSnapshotTask#call() method there is this: > {code} > region.flush(true); > {code} > The return value is not checked. > In HRegion#flushcache(), Result.CANNOT_FLUSH may be returned due to: > {code} > String msg = "Not flushing since " > + (writestate.flushing ? "already flushing" > : "writes not enabled"); > {code} > This implies that FlushSnapshotSubprocedure may incorrectly skip waiting for the concurrent flush to complete. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)