Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF104200C80 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:15:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CD9A7160BCA; Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 20C4F160BB4 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:15:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 86542 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2017 17:15:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 86528 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2017 17:15:08 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 627DFC0CEB for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.502 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.502 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id enGFS_gc5P0Y for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id AC4D260F6C for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C45D4E0DD5 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0474E24017 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sean Busbey (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18042) Client Compatibility breaks between versions 1.2 and 1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 25 May 2017 17:15:11 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16025047#comment-16025047 ] Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-18042: ------------------------------------- looks like the jdk the branch-1 dockerfile wants isn't available from oracle. > Client Compatibility breaks between versions 1.2 and 1.3 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-18042 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18042 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: regionserver, scan > Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.1 > Reporter: Karan Mehta > Assignee: Duo Zhang > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.2 > > Attachments: HBASE-18042-branch-1.3.patch, HBASE-18042-branch-1.patch, HBASE-18042-branch-1.patch, HBASE-18042-branch-1-v1.patch, HBASE-18042-branch-1-v1.patch, HBASE-18042.patch, HBASE-18042-v1.patch, HBASE-18042-v2.patch > > > OpenTSDB uses AsyncHBase as its client, rather than using the traditional HBase Client. From version 1.2 to 1.3, the {{ClientProtos}} have been changed. Newer fields are added to {{ScanResponse}} proto. > For a typical Scan request in 1.2, would require caller to make an OpenScanner Request, GetNextRows Request and a CloseScanner Request, based on {{more_rows}} boolean field in the {{ScanResponse}} proto. > However, from 1.3, new parameter {{more_results_in_region}} was added, which limits the results per region. Therefore the client has to now manage sending all the requests for each region. Further more, if the results are exhausted from a particular region, the {{ScanResponse}} will set {{more_results_in_region}} to false, but {{more_results}} can still be true. Whenever the former is set to false, the {{RegionScanner}} will also be closed. > OpenTSDB makes an OpenScanner Request and receives all its results in the first {{ScanResponse}} itself, thus creating a condition as described in above paragraph. Since {{more_rows}} is true, it will proceed to send next request at which point the {{RSRpcServices}} will throw {{UnknownScannerException}}. The protobuf client compatibility is maintained but expected behavior is modified. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)