hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yu Li (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17887) Row-level consistency is broken for read
Date Fri, 12 May 2017 10:26:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16007922#comment-16007922
] 

Yu Li commented on HBASE-17887:
-------------------------------

I could see the fix version includes 1.2.6 and 1.3.2, so the Row-level consistency is broken
in some of our released version? If so, from which version? Mind update the {{Affects Version}}
field? Thanks. [~chia7712]

Since breaking consistency sounds quite critical to me, I think we need a special note in
dev mailing list.

[~mantonov] FYI sir.

> Row-level consistency is broken for read
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17887
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Umesh Agashe
>            Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.2.6, 1.3.2, 1.4.1
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-17887.branch-1.v0.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v1.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v1.patch,
HBASE-17887.branch-1.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v3.patch,
HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch,
HBASE-17887.branch-1.v5.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v6.patch, HBASE-17887.ut.patch, HBASE-17887.v0.patch,
HBASE-17887.v1.patch, HBASE-17887.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.v3.patch, HBASE-17887.v4.patch, HBASE-17887.v5.patch,
HBASE-17887.v5.patch
>
>
> As per the flaky tests dashboard here: https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html,
It fails 30% of the time.
> While working on HBASE-17863, a few verification builds on patch failed due to TestAcidGuarantees
didn't pass. IMHO, the changes for HBASE-17863 are unlikely to affect get/ put path.
> I ran the test with and without the patch several times locally and found that TestAcidGuarantees
fails without the patch similar number of times.
> Opening blocker, considering acid guarantees are critical to HBase.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message