hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anoop Sam John (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17887) Row-level consistency is broken for read
Date Fri, 12 May 2017 09:42:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16007878#comment-16007878

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-17887:

Had a thought and I know the impl is hard.  Was just saying an ideal way.  Need to see how
easily we can check whether this new file belong to which scanner.  Any way of ID mapping
or so?  Am not at all sure.  Any way just see.. This fix will solve the issue.  Was just saying
an ideal and more efficient way with no unwanted new scanners and seeks. :-)

> Row-level consistency is broken for read
> ----------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-17887
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Umesh Agashe
>            Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.2.6, 1.3.2, 1.4.1
>         Attachments: HBASE-17887.branch-1.v0.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v1.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v1.patch,
HBASE-17887.branch-1.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v3.patch,
HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch,
HBASE-17887.branch-1.v5.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v6.patch, HBASE-17887.ut.patch, HBASE-17887.v0.patch,
HBASE-17887.v1.patch, HBASE-17887.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.v3.patch, HBASE-17887.v4.patch, HBASE-17887.v5.patch,
> As per the flaky tests dashboard here: https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html,
It fails 30% of the time.
> While working on HBASE-17863, a few verification builds on patch failed due to TestAcidGuarantees
didn't pass. IMHO, the changes for HBASE-17863 are unlikely to affect get/ put path.
> I ran the test with and without the patch several times locally and found that TestAcidGuarantees
fails without the patch similar number of times.
> Opening blocker, considering acid guarantees are critical to HBase.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message