Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2930F200C48 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:28:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 26431160BA4; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F4D1160B83 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:28:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 30318 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2017 08:28:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 30307 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2017 08:28:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:28:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 23289C2365 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id okrd-AK09AEK for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6CBAC5FC7A for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0A4DDE06BE for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id BC0FC24069 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:28:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Enis Soztutar (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17882) Why do the WalEdit implement the Writable interface MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:28:46 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15958533#comment-15958533 ] Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-17882: --------------------------------------- See HBASE-16477, and other subtasks in the parent. > Why do the WalEdit implement the Writable interface > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-17882 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17882 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Brainstorming > Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai > Priority: Minor > > Do we have any use cases? (serialize/deserialize the WalEdit between mapper and reducer?) If not, we should make WalEdit not implement the Writable interface. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)