hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17882) Why do the WalEdit implement the Writable interface
Date Thu, 06 Apr 2017 04:10:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15958256#comment-15958256
] 

stack commented on HBASE-17882:
-------------------------------

Agreed. Concern is a new version being able to read old WALs. I've not looked in a while.
Would this be a problem?

> Why do the WalEdit implement the Writable interface
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17882
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17882
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>            Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Do we have any use cases? (serialize/deserialize the WalEdit between mapper and reducer?)
If not, we should make WalEdit not implement the Writable interface.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message