hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Josh Elser (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17794) Remove lingering "violation" in favor of the accurate "snapshot"
Date Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:28:42 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Josh Elser updated HBASE-17794:
-------------------------------
    Attachment: HBASE-17794.001.HBASE-16961.patch

.001 The things I found incorrectly using "violation" via a {{fgrep -i violation}}.

> Remove lingering "violation" in favor of the accurate "snapshot"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17794
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17794
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: HBASE-16961
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-17794.001.HBASE-16961.patch
>
>
> Previously, quota violations used to be stored in the quota table. Eventually, I realized
that I needed to actually persist the utilization of each table/NS, not just the violation
state.
> I know there are cases in the code where "violation" is incorrectly describing things
(it should be "snapshot"). Clean these up for clarity.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message