Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381FC200C18 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:21:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 36A85160B60; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 81CE2160B5B for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:21:32 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 39303 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2017 00:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 39292 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2017 00:21:31 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F052EC0F8E for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKr9W52Hl46H for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4D8885FCF8 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5CBE6E044B for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 930E425299 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17565) StochasticLoadBalancer may incorrectly skip balancing due to skewed multiplier sum MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:21:33 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-17565: --------------------------- Attachment: 17565.v1.txt Patch v1 follows option #2 above. In cluster testing, the balancer starts to balance regions. However, there're a lot of test failures. So I want to get other people's input first. > StochasticLoadBalancer may incorrectly skip balancing due to skewed multiplier sum > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-17565 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17565 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ted Yu > Assignee: Ted Yu > Attachments: 17565.v1.txt > > > I was investigating why a 6 node cluster kept skipping balancing requests. > Here were the region counts on the servers: > 449, 448, 447, 449, 453, 0 > {code} > 2017-01-26 22:04:47,145 INFO [RpcServer.deafult.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=1,queue=0,port=16000] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: Skipping load balancing because balanced cluster; total cost is 127.0171157050385, sum multiplier is 111087.0 min cost which need balance is 0.05 > {code} > The big multiplier sum caught my eyes. Here was what additional debug logging showed: > {code} > 2017-01-27 23:25:31,749 DEBUG [RpcServer.deafult.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=9,queue=0,port=16000] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer. StochasticLoadBalancer$RegionReplicaHostCostFunction with multiplier 100000.0 > 2017-01-27 23:25:31,749 DEBUG [RpcServer.deafult.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=9,queue=0,port=16000] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer. StochasticLoadBalancer$RegionReplicaRackCostFunction with multiplier 10000.0 > {code} > Note however, that no table in the cluster used read replica. > I can think of two ways of fixing this situation: > 1. If there is no read replica in the cluster, ignore the multipliers for the above two functions. > 2. When cost() returned by the CostFunction is 0 (or very very close to 0.0), ignore the multiplier. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)