Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FCA200C07 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:34:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 01A1F160B45; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 49F49160B38 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:34:34 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 63821 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2017 08:34:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 63808 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2017 08:34:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E4A661A004C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S1I6NqSo-A0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 839965F4A8 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 80ACEE0350 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id C9D2725289 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Duo Zhang (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17489) ClientScanner may send a next request to a RegionScanner which has been exhausted MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:34:35 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15833363#comment-15833363 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17489: ----------------------------------- And for branch-1.3, {{TestMetaWithReplicas}} fails without the patch either. Will commit shortly. And for branch-1.2-, I do not think we will introduce new features on these branches, so it is not a big deal to not apply the patch as the bug does not impact correctness. Thanks. > ClientScanner may send a next request to a RegionScanner which has been exhausted > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-17489 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Client, scan > Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0 > Reporter: Duo Zhang > Assignee: Duo Zhang > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.1 > > Attachments: HBASE-17489-branch-1.3.patch, HBASE-17489-branch-1.patch, HBASE-17489.patch, HBASE-17489-v1.patch, HBASE-17489-v2.patch, HBASE-17489-v3.patch, HBASE-17489-v4.patch, HBASE-17489-v4.patch, HBASE-17489-v5.patch, HBASE-17489-v6.patch > > > Found it when implementing HBASE-17045. Seems the final result of the scan is correct but no doubt the logic is broken. We need to fix it to stop things get worse in the future. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)