hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17527) Allow IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table to be in memory compacted
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:58:26 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15838122#comment-15838122
] 

stack commented on HBASE-17527:
-------------------------------

bq. No. By default new tables use MemoryCompactionPolicy.NONE

Even if it were to be off by default -- we want it to be on by default -- making it so you
can set policy with commands to ITBLL (only!) is just short-sighted. We have a swath of IT
jobs. I have to go edit each of those individually to do as  here if I want to test inmemory
options as is done here? The poor user finds these options on ITBLL then goes to use another
tool and they are not present?

> Allow IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table to be in memory compacted
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17527
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>         Attachments: 17527.v1.txt, 17527.v2.txt
>
>
> Currently IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table doesn't support specification of in memory
compaction scheme.
> This JIRA is to add support for specifying different in memory compaction policies.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message