hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Yu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17379) Lack of synchronization in CompactionPipeline#getScanners()
Date Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:27:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15811773#comment-15811773
] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-17379:
--------------------------------

TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush is in master, but without getScanners() in place, the bug wouldn't
be triggered.

bq. Eshcar's patch is generated on master branch which does't have unit test.

Eshcar's patch only changed TestHeapSize which was required for test suite to run. There is
no new test showing the correctness of the change.

bq. What if CompactionPipeline#getScanners() in HBASE-17081 will be implemented using getSegments()
which are already synchronized?

Copy on write semantics allows getScanners() to proceed without synchronization. In a multi-reader
scenario, this is more performant.

> Lack of synchronization in CompactionPipeline#getScanners()
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17379
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17379
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: Ted Yu
>         Attachments: 17379.HBASE-17081.v28.txt, 17379.HBASE-17081.v29.txt, 17379.HBASE-17081.v30.txt,
17379.HBASE-17081.v31.txt, 17379.HBASE-17081.v33.txt, 17379.HBASE-17081.v34.txt, 17379.v1.txt,
17379.v14.txt, 17379.v2.txt, 17379.v3.txt, 17379.v4.txt, 17379.v5.txt, 17379.v6.txt, 17379.v8.txt
>
>
> From https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5053/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver/TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush/testWritesWhileGetting/
:
> {code}
> java.io.IOException: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.handleException(HRegion.java:5886)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.initializeScanners(HRegion.java:5856)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.<init>(HRegion.java:5819)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.instantiateRegionScanner(HRegion.java:2786)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getScanner(HRegion.java:2766)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.get(HRegion.java:7036)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.get(HRegion.java:7015)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.get(HRegion.java:6994)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegion.testWritesWhileGetting(TestHRegion.java:4141)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> 	at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> 	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
> 	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> 	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.FailOnTimeout$CallableStatement.call(FailOnTimeout.java:298)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.FailOnTimeout$CallableStatement.call(FailOnTimeout.java:292)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException: null
> 	at java.util.LinkedList$ListItr.checkForComodification(LinkedList.java:966)
> 	at java.util.LinkedList$ListItr.next(LinkedList.java:888)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.CompactionPipeline.getScanners(CompactionPipeline.java:220)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.CompactingMemStore.getScanners(CompactingMemStore.java:298)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.getScanners(HStore.java:1154)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.Store.getScanners(Store.java:97)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner.getScannersNoCompaction(StoreScanner.java:353)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner.<init>(StoreScanner.java:210)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.createScanner(HStore.java:1892)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.getScanner(HStore.java:1880)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.initializeScanners(HRegion.java:5842)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.<init>(HRegion.java:5819)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.instantiateRegionScanner(HRegion.java:2786)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getScanner(HRegion.java:2766)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.get(HRegion.java:7036)
> {code}
> The cause is in CompactionPipeline#getScanners() where there is no synchronization around
iterating pipeline.
> The code causing ConcurrentModificationException:
> {code}
>     for (Segment segment : this.pipeline) {
> {code}
> was introduced by HBASE-17081



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message