hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17174) Refactor the AsyncProcess, BufferedMutatorImpl, and HTable
Date Tue, 27 Dec 2016 11:32:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15780220#comment-15780220

Hudson commented on HBASE-17174:

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #2207 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/2207/])
HBASE-17174 Addendum fix typo (zhangduo: rev 5ffbd4a87d73caee3ab27ae8d6a47cd36afc859f)
* (edit) hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/RequestController.java
* (edit) hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/SimpleRequestController.java

> Refactor the AsyncProcess, BufferedMutatorImpl, and HTable
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-17174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
>            Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>         Attachments: HBASE-17174.addendum.patch, HBASE-17174.v0.patch, HBASE-17174.v1.patch,
HBASE-17174.v10.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch,
HBASE-17174.v12.patch, HBASE-17174.v13.patch, HBASE-17174.v2.patch, HBASE-17174.v3.patch,
HBASE-17174.v4.patch, HBASE-17174.v5.patch, HBASE-17174.v6.patch, HBASE-17174.v7.patch, HBASE-17174.v8.patch,
> The following are reasons of refactoring.
> # A update-heavy application, for example, loader, creates many BufferedMutator for batch
updates. But these BufferedMutators can’t share a large threadpool because the shutdown()
method will be called when closing any BufferedMutator. This patch adds a flag into BufferedMutatorParams
for preventing calling the shutdown() method in BufferedMutatorImpl#close
> # The AsyncProcess has the powerful traffic control, but the control is against the single
table currently. We should allow alternate traffic control implementation for advanced user
who want more control.
> All suggestions are welcome.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message