hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ChiaPing Tsai (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (HBASE-17034) HTable#exist and HTable#existAll are flaky
Date Sun, 06 Nov 2016 09:08:58 GMT
ChiaPing Tsai created HBASE-17034:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: HTable#exist and HTable#existAll are flaky
                 Key: HBASE-17034
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17034
             Project: HBase
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
            Priority: Minor



# HTable#exist apply the default consistency, but HTable#existAll dosen’t
# HTable#existAll may change the passed Gets , but HTable#exist dosen’t. (HTable#get(Get,
boolean) clones the passed Get)

So we have some issues outlined below.
# Can the passed Get be modified? If so, we can save the clone of Get. If not, the HTable#getScanner()
modify the passed Scan for some unset variables, so it is ok to modify the passed Get I guess.

# Should we assign the default Consistency to the passed Get which has an null value of Consistency?
# Should the HTable#exist be implemented by HTable#existAll? If so, it may be duplicated 
to [HBASE-16953|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16593]. If not, it seems to me
that we should unify all exist methods by AP. :)

Any comment? Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message