hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16890) Analyze the performance of AsyncWAL and fix the same
Date Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:14:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15610833#comment-15610833
] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16890:
------------------------------------------------

for this test I did not apply any other patch other than the above patch. Those things are
actually not the real killers. But for our offheap thing to work yes we surely need to do
some change in the AsyncWALProtbufWriter#append  part. And I don't have the lib with me so
things are working by creating temp buffers only. If we do all those we can reduce some more
garbage.

> Analyze the performance of AsyncWAL and fix the same
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16890
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16890
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: wal
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: AsyncWAL_disruptor.patch, Screen Shot 2016-10-25 at 7.34.47 PM.png,
Screen Shot 2016-10-25 at 7.39.07 PM.png, Screen Shot 2016-10-25 at 7.39.48 PM.png, async.svg,
classic.svg, contention.png, contention_defaultWAL.png
>
>
> Tests reveal that AsyncWAL under load in single node cluster performs slower than the
Default WAL. This task is to analyze and see if we could fix it.
> See some discussions in the tail of JIRA HBASE-15536.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message