hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anoop Sam John (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15789) PB related changes to work with offheap
Date Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:33:22 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15575955#comment-15575955
] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-15789:
----------------------------------------

Oh.. I just committed the new PB src files in my local repo (Into the protocol-shaded project)
and then did an mvn package.. We will compile those src in this project also right? In fact
it added. When running PE on newly built tar, 1st time I got issues because of my impl, I
got stack trace from the new CIS and ByteInputByteString. That means in PB jars those are
there.   Sorry am not really knowing how we should do the PB files checkin to our repo

> PB related changes to work with offheap
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15789
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15789
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-15789.patch, HBASE-15789_V2.patch
>
>
> This is an issue to brainstorm. Whether we go with pb 2.x or pb 3.0 and also depends
on the shading of protobuf classes. 
> We should also decide if we are going to fork the PB classes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message