Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D35F200B8C for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:51:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7B98A160AB8; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B289160AB3 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:51:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 4858 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2016 13:51:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 4743 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2016 13:51:20 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:51:20 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4E12C1B82 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:51:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tomu Tsuruhara (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16616) Rpc handlers stuck on ThreadLocalMap.expungeStaleEntry MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:51:27 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomu Tsuruhara updated HBASE-16616: ----------------------------------- Description: In our HBase 1.2.2 cluster, some regionserver showed too bad "QueueCallTime_99th_percentile" exceeding 10 seconds. Most rpc handler threads stuck on ThreadLocalMap.expungeStaleEntry call at that time. {noformat} "PriorityRpcServer.handler=18,queue=0,port=16020" #322 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fd422062800 nid=0x19b89 runnable [0x00007fcb8a821000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.expungeStaleEntry(ThreadLocal.java:617) at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.remove(ThreadLocal.java:499) at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.access$200(ThreadLocal.java:298) at java.lang.ThreadLocal.remove(ThreadLocal.java:222) at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock$Sync.tryReleaseShared(ReentrantReadWriteLock.java:426) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.releaseShared(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1341) at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock$ReadLock.unlock(ReentrantReadWriteLock.java:881) at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.unlockForRegularUsage(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:196) at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.update(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:113) at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.update(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:81) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.lib.MutableHistogram.add(MutableHistogram.java:81) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.lib.MutableRangeHistogram.add(MutableRangeHistogram.java:59) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.MetricsHBaseServerSourceImpl.dequeuedCall(MetricsHBaseServerSourceImpl.java:194) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.MetricsHBaseServer.dequeuedCall(MetricsHBaseServer.java:76) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2192) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:112) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) {noformat} We were using jdk 1.8.0_92 and here is a snippet from ThreadLocal.java. {code} 616: while (tab[h] != null) 617: h = nextIndex(h, len); {code} So I hypothesized that there're too many consecutive entries in {{tab}} array and actually I found them in the heapdump. !ScreenShot 2016-09-09 14.17.53.png|width=50%! Most of these entries pointed at instance of {{org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$1}} which is equivarent to {{indexHolderThreadLocal}} instance-variable in the {{Counter}} class. Because {{RpcServer$Connection}} class creates a {{Counter}} instance {{rpcCount}} for every connections, it is possible to have lots of {{Counter#indexHolderThreadLocal}} instances in RegionServer process when we repeat connect-and-close from client. As a result, a ThreadLocalMap can have lots of consecutive entires. Usually, since each entry is a {{WeakReference}}, these entries are collected and removed by garbage-collector soon after connection closed. But if connection's life-time was long enough to survive youngGC, it wouldn't be collected until old-gen collector runs. Furthermore, under G1GC deployment, it is possible not to be collected even by old-gen GC(mixed GC) if entries sit in a region which doesn't have much garbages. Actually we used G1GC when we encountered this problem. We should remove the entry from ThreadLocalMap by calling ThreadLocal#remove explicitly. was: In our HBase 1.2.2 cluster, some regionserver showed too bad "QueueCallTime_99th_percentile" exceeding 10 seconds. Most rpc handler threads stuck on ThreadLocalMap.expungeStaleEntry call at that time. {noformat} "PriorityRpcServer.handler=18,queue=0,port=16020" #322 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fd422062800 nid=0x19b89 runnable [0x00007fcb8a821000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.expungeStaleEntry(ThreadLocal.java:617) at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.remove(ThreadLocal.java:499) at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.access$200(ThreadLocal.java:298) at java.lang.ThreadLocal.remove(ThreadLocal.java:222) at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock$Sync.tryReleaseShared(ReentrantReadWriteLock.java:426) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.releaseShared(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1341) at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock$ReadLock.unlock(ReentrantReadWriteLock.java:881) at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.unlockForRegularUsage(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:196) at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.update(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:113) at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.update(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:81) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.lib.MutableHistogram.add(MutableHistogram.java:81) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.lib.MutableRangeHistogram.add(MutableRangeHistogram.java:59) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.MetricsHBaseServerSourceImpl.dequeuedCall(MetricsHBaseServerSourceImpl.java:194) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.MetricsHBaseServer.dequeuedCall(MetricsHBaseServer.java:76) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2192) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:112) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) {noformat} We were using jdk 1.8.0_92 and here is a snippet from ThreadLocal.java. {code} 616: while (tab[h] != null) 617: h = nextIndex(h, len); {code} So I hypothesized that there're too many consecutive entries in {{tab}} array and actually I found them in the heapdump. !ScreenShot 2016-09-09 14.17.53.png|thumbnail! Most of those entries pointed at instance of {{org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$1}} which is equivarent to {{indexHolderThreadLocal}} instance-variable in the {{Counter}} class. Because {{RpcServer$Connection}} class creates a {{Counter}} instance {{rpcCount}} for every connections, it is possible to have lots of {{Counter#indexHolderThreadLocal}} instances in RegionServer process when we repeat connect-and-close from client. As a result, a ThreadLocalMap can have lots of consecutive entires. Usually, since each entry is a {{WeakReference}}, these entries are collected and removed by garbage-collector soon after connection closed. But if connection's life-time was long enough to survive youngGC, it wouldn't be collected until old-gen collector runs. Furthermore, under G1GC deployment, it is possible not to be collected even by old-gen GC(mixed GC) if entries sit in a region which doesn't have much garbages. Actually we used G1GC when we encountered this problem. We should remove the entry from ThreadLocalMap by calling ThreadLocal#remove explicitly. > Rpc handlers stuck on ThreadLocalMap.expungeStaleEntry > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-16616 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16616 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Performance > Affects Versions: 1.2.2 > Reporter: Tomu Tsuruhara > Attachments: ScreenShot 2016-09-09 14.17.53.png > > > In our HBase 1.2.2 cluster, some regionserver showed too bad "QueueCallTime_99th_percentile" exceeding 10 seconds. > Most rpc handler threads stuck on ThreadLocalMap.expungeStaleEntry call at that time. > {noformat} > "PriorityRpcServer.handler=18,queue=0,port=16020" #322 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fd422062800 nid=0x19b89 runnable [0x00007fcb8a821000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.expungeStaleEntry(ThreadLocal.java:617) > at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.remove(ThreadLocal.java:499) > at java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap.access$200(ThreadLocal.java:298) > at java.lang.ThreadLocal.remove(ThreadLocal.java:222) > at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock$Sync.tryReleaseShared(ReentrantReadWriteLock.java:426) > at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.releaseShared(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1341) > at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock$ReadLock.unlock(ReentrantReadWriteLock.java:881) > at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.unlockForRegularUsage(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:196) > at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.update(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:113) > at com.yammer.metrics.stats.ExponentiallyDecayingSample.update(ExponentiallyDecayingSample.java:81) > at org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.lib.MutableHistogram.add(MutableHistogram.java:81) > at org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.lib.MutableRangeHistogram.add(MutableRangeHistogram.java:59) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.MetricsHBaseServerSourceImpl.dequeuedCall(MetricsHBaseServerSourceImpl.java:194) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.MetricsHBaseServer.dequeuedCall(MetricsHBaseServer.java:76) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2192) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:112) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > {noformat} > We were using jdk 1.8.0_92 and here is a snippet from ThreadLocal.java. > {code} > 616: while (tab[h] != null) > 617: h = nextIndex(h, len); > {code} > So I hypothesized that there're too many consecutive entries in {{tab}} array and actually I found them in the heapdump. > !ScreenShot 2016-09-09 14.17.53.png|width=50%! > Most of these entries pointed at instance of {{org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$1}} > which is equivarent to {{indexHolderThreadLocal}} instance-variable in the {{Counter}} class. > Because {{RpcServer$Connection}} class creates a {{Counter}} instance {{rpcCount}} for every connections, > it is possible to have lots of {{Counter#indexHolderThreadLocal}} instances in RegionServer process > when we repeat connect-and-close from client. As a result, a ThreadLocalMap can have lots of consecutive > entires. > Usually, since each entry is a {{WeakReference}}, these entries are collected and removed > by garbage-collector soon after connection closed. > But if connection's life-time was long enough to survive youngGC, it wouldn't be collected until old-gen collector runs. > Furthermore, under G1GC deployment, it is possible not to be collected even by old-gen GC(mixed GC) > if entries sit in a region which doesn't have much garbages. > Actually we used G1GC when we encountered this problem. > We should remove the entry from ThreadLocalMap by calling ThreadLocal#remove explicitly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)