Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:44:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12976620.1465333073000.608578.1474314262243@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12976620.1465333073000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12976620.1465333073000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.12976620.1465333073087@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15984) Given failure to parse a given WAL
 that was closed cleanly, replay the WAL.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:44:24 -0000


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15504455#comment-15504455 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-15984:
----------------------------------------

That is my take too. So I'd say commit back to 1.2, let [~ndimiduk] decide if he wants it in 1.1 and I'll pick back to 0.98. Sound like a plan?

> Given failure to parse a given WAL that was closed cleanly, replay the WAL.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15984
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15984
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Replication
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Sean Busbey
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.4, 1.4.0, 1.3.1, 1.1.7, 0.98.23, 1.2.4
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-15984.1.patch, HBASE-15984.2.patch
>
>
> subtask for a general work around for "underlying reader failed / is in a bad state" just for the case where a WAL 1) was closed cleanly and 2) we can tell that our current offset ought not be the end of parseable entries.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)