hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anastasia Braginsky (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16229) Cleaning up size and heapSize calculation
Date Mon, 05 Sep 2016 11:28:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15464790#comment-15464790

Anastasia Braginsky commented on HBASE-16229:

Hey, [~anoop.hbase],

I have seen your replies to my first review part, all looks very good :)
I would like to ask you, to remove my comments by pressing FIX or DROP or at least please
add some comment-reply to each comment of mine so I can understand your intention and press
FIX or DROP :) :)
I can reopen any issue if I disagree with you.

Here are the issues that we agreed so far to cope with them in another JIRAs:
1. AbstractMemStore's heapSizeChange() is going to be removed and heapSizeChange() is going
to appear only in segments.
2. In Memstore interface we have size() and keySize(). In AbstractMemStore interface we have
another heapSize() which is actually directly invokes the size(). Let's have only size() and
keySize() everywhere.
Please let me know if I understand it correctly and if yes, please specify under which JIRA
you are going to take care.

Thank you very much for what you are doing! This is a very important and scrupulous fix you
are doing!
I am continuing the review :)

> Cleaning up size and heapSize calculation
> -----------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-16229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16229
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>         Attachments: HBASE-16229.patch, HBASE-16229_V2.patch, HBASE-16229_V3.patch, HBASE-16229_V4.patch,
HBASE-16229_V5.patch, HBASE-16229_V5.patch
> It is bit ugly now. For eg:
> AbstractMemStore
> {code}
> public final static long FIXED_OVERHEAD = ClassSize.align(
>       ClassSize.OBJECT +
>           (4 * ClassSize.REFERENCE) +
>           (2 * Bytes.SIZEOF_LONG));
>   public final static long DEEP_OVERHEAD = ClassSize.align(FIXED_OVERHEAD +
>       (ClassSize.ATOMIC_LONG + ClassSize.TIMERANGE_TRACKER +
> {code}
> We include the heap overhead of Segment also here. It will be better the Segment contains
its overhead part and the Memstore impl uses the heap size of all of its segments to calculate
its size.
> Also this
> {code}
> public long heapSize() {
>     return getActive().getSize();
>   }
> {code}
> HeapSize to consider all segment's size not just active's. I am not able to see an override
method in CompactingMemstore.
> This jira tries to solve some of these.
> When we create a Segment, we seems pass some initial heap size value to it. Why?  The
segment object internally has to know what is its heap size not like some one else dictate
> More to add when doing this cleanup

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message