hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:46:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407973#comment-15407973

stack commented on HBASE-16308:

The TestLogLevel failure is because httpserver did not deploy. The TestClient... failure is
real (failed to handle a mocked usage).

This is ready for review. It is mostly applying a boring pattern. Thanks.

> Contain protobuf references
> ---------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-16308
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Protobufs
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>         Attachments: HBASE-16308.master.001.patch, HBASE-16308.master.002.patch, HBASE-16308.master.003.patch,
HBASE-16308.master.004.patch, HBASE-16308.master.005.patch, HBASE-16308.master.006.patch
> Clean up our protobuf references so contained to just a few classes rather than being
spread about the codebase. Doing this work will make it easier landing the parent issue and
will make it more clear where the division between shaded protobuf and unshaded protobuf lies
(we need to continue with unshaded protobuf for HDFS references by AsyncWAL and probably EndPoint

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message