hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15866) Split hbase.rpc.timeout into *.read.timeout and *.write.timeout
Date Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:38:20 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-15866:
    Fix Version/s: 1.4.0

I've done some poking around with 0.98. The code is significantly different. RegionServerCallable
and RpcRetryingCaller implementations differ, especially RegionServerCallable#prepare (in
0.98 we use separate callers with rpc settings derived from connection not table to do region
relocation, so we don't correctly honor the table level settings) and RpcRetryingCaller#callWithRetry
(uses a thread local for setting rpc timeouts in 0.98, later versions don't). Setting a RPC
timeout in configuration works. Both connection and table pick it up. Using only the setter
on HTable doesn't. Only the callables created by the table use the setting; others created
by the HConnection do not. 

I'm not saying it can't be done, but it's much easier to achieve this with master and branch-1,
and why not have another reason to move off of 0.98. 

Updated fix versions accordingly, only targeting master and branch-1. 

If someone feels differently about porting this back to 0.98, by all means open another issue
for backport and tackle it there.

> Split hbase.rpc.timeout into *.read.timeout and *.write.timeout
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-15866
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15866
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Vivek Koppuru
>              Labels: newbie, patch
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>         Attachments: HBASE-15866.patch, HBASE-15866.patch, HBASE-15866.patch, read-write-rpc-timeouts.patch,
> We have a single tunable for the RPC timeout interval - hbase.rpc.timeout. This is fine
for the general case but there are use cases where it would be advantageous to set two separate
timeouts for reads (gets, scans, perhaps with significant server side filtering - although
the new scanner heartbeat feature mitigates where available) and mutations (fail fast under
tight SLA, resubmit or take mitigating action). 
> I propose we refer to a configuration setting "hbase.rpc.read.timeout" when handling
read operations and "hbase.rpc.write.timeout" when handling write operations. If those values
are not set in the configuration, fall back to the value of "hbase.rpc.timeout" or its default.

> So for example in HTable instead of one global timeout for each RPC (rpcTimeout), there
would be a readRpcTimeout and writeRpcTimeout also set up in HTable#finishSetup. Then wherever
we set up RPC with RpcRetryingCallerFactory#newCaller(int rpcTimeout) we pass in the read
or write timeout depending on what the op is.
> In general I don't like the idea of adding configuration parameters to our already heavyweight
set, but I think the inability to control timeouts separately for reads and writes is an operational
> See also PHOENIX-2916.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message