Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F260200B49 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 23:25:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 1DDB4160A34; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 65F7E160A65 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 23:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 89636 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2016 21:25:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 89559 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2016 21:25:11 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:25:11 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B99F2C02AF for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:25:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16074) ITBLL fails, reports lost big or tiny families MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:25:13 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15361787#comment-15361787 ] Mikhail Antonov commented on HBASE-16074: ----------------------------------------- You mean eight unreferenced nodes were with normal in-Loop run w/ Monkeys and the last step was w/o them? With the last patch half of the runs failed for me with the same errors (seems to be it happens less often not, though I'm not sure which one I like more - the bug which causes data loss always or in half runs..yeah). Also tried to revert the patch and run w/o it. Saw 4 or 5 successful runs so far, none failed. > ITBLL fails, reports lost big or tiny families > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-16074 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16074 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: integration tests > Affects Versions: 1.3.0, 0.98.20 > Reporter: Mikhail Antonov > Assignee: Mikhail Antonov > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.21 > > Attachments: 16074.test.branch-1.3.patch, 16074.test.patch, HBASE-16074.branch-1.3.001.patch, HBASE-16074.branch-1.3.002.patch, HBASE-16074.branch-1.3.003.patch, HBASE-16074.branch-1.3.003.patch, changes_to_stress_ITBLL.patch, changes_to_stress_ITBLL__a_bit_relaxed_.patch, itbll log with failure, itbll log with success > > > Underlying MR jobs succeed but I'm seeing the following in the logs (mid-size distributed test cluster): > ERROR test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList$Verify: Found nodes which lost big or tiny families, count=164 > I do not know exactly yet whether it's a bug, a test issue or env setup issue, but need figure it out. Opening this to raise awareness and see if someone saw that recently. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)