Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:31:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: "stack (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12957289.1460138448000.13617.1466116265649@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12957289.1460138448000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12957289.1460138448000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.12957289.1460138448213@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15619) Performance regression observed:
 Empty random read(get) performance of branch-1 worse than 0.98
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:31:07 -0000


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15334835#comment-15334835 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-15619:
-------------------------------

[~carp84] I think the difference between my tests here and HBASE-15971 are that in HBASE-15971 I was trying to overload the regionserver and had many YCSB instances running whereas on the former, I had a single instance running. Doing the overloading seems to have brought out the issue you saw. Have you tried HBASE-15971 on your setup? Hopefully you'll see an improvement...

> Performance regression observed: Empty random read(get) performance of branch-1 worse than 0.98
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15619
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>         Attachments: compare.png, flamegraph-108588.098.svg, flamegraph-1221.branch-1.svg, flamegraph-135684.1.1.svg
>
>
> As titled, I observed the perf regression in the final stress testing before upgrading our online cluster to 1.x. More details as follows:
> 1. HBase version in the comparison test:
>   * 0.98: based on 0.98.12 with some backports, among which HBASE-11297 is the most important perf-related one (especially under high stress)
>   * 1.x: checked 3 releases in total
>      1) 1.1.2 with important perf fixes/improvements including HBASE-15031 and HBASE-14465
>      2) 1.1.4 release
>      3) 1.2.1RC1
> 2. Test environment
>     * YCSB: 0.7.0 with [YCSB-651|https://github.com/brianfrankcooper/YCSB/pull/651] applied
>     * Client: 4 physical nodes, each with 8 YCSB instance, each instance with 100 threads
>     * Server: 1 Master with 3 RS, each RS with 256 handlers and 64G heap
>     * Hardware: 64-core CPU, 256GB Mem, 10Gb Net, 1 PCIe-SSD and 11 HDD, same hardware for client and server
> 3. Test cases
>     * -p fieldcount=1 -p fieldlength=128 -p readproportion=1
>     * case #1: read against empty table
>     * -case #2: lrucache 100% hit-
>     * -case #3: BLOCKCACHE=>false-
> 4. Test result
> * 1.1.4 and 1.2.1 have a similar perf (less than 2% deviation) as 1.1.2+, so will only paste comparison data of 0.98.12+ and 1.1.2+
> * per-RS Throughput(ops/s)
> ||HBaseVersion||case#1||-case#2-||-case#3-||
> |0.98.12+|383562|-257493-|-47594-|
> |1.1.2+|363050|-232757-|-35872-|
> * AverageLatency(us)
> ||HBaseVersion||case#1||-case#2-||-case#3-||
> |0.98.12+|2774|-4134-|-22371-|
> |1.1.2+|2930|-4572-|-29690-|
> It seems there's perf regression on RPCServer (we tried 0.98 client against 1.x server and observed a similar perf to 1.x client)


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)