hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16048) Consider tagging InternalScanner with LimitedPrivate(HBaseInterfaceAudience.COPROC)
Date Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:47:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15334993#comment-15334993
] 

Joep Rottinghuis commented on HBASE-16048:
------------------------------------------

Isn't the question here: Can anybody reasonably use BaseRegionObserver when implementing a
coprocessor but not use InternalScanner?
If the answer is no, then by inference InternalScanner must be tagged with LimitedPrivate(HBaseInterfaceAudience.COPROC)
right?

> Consider tagging InternalScanner with LimitedPrivate(HBaseInterfaceAudience.COPROC) 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16048
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16048
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>
> Some methods (preCompact, preCompactScannerOpen, preFlush, preFlushScannerOpen, etc)
of BaseRegionObserver take InternalScanner as input argument as well as the return type.
> BaseRegionObserver is tagged with @InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate(HBaseInterfaceAudience.COPROC)
but InternalScanner is tagged with @InterfaceAudience.Private.
> This JIRA is to discuss tagging InternalScanner with @InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate(HBaseInterfaceAudience.COPROC).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message