Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:23:25 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Phil Yang (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12951497.1458300018000.582.1458537805684@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12951497.1458300018000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12951497.1458300018000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12951497.1458300018373@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15484) Correct the semantic of batch and
 partial
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15203736#comment-15203736 ] 

Phil Yang commented on HBASE-15484:
-----------------------------------

Hi [~anoop.hbase] 
Please help me to review this patch, thanks

> Correct the semantic of batch and partial
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15484
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15484
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.1.3
>            Reporter: Phil Yang
>            Assignee: Phil Yang
>         Attachments: HBASE-15484-v1.patch
>
>
> Follow-up to HBASE-15325, as discussed, the meaning of setBatch and setAllowPartialResults should not be same. We should not regard setBatch as setAllowPartialResults.
> And isPartial should be define accurately.
> (Considering getBatch==MaxInt if we don't setBatch.) If result.rawcells.length<scan.getBatch && result is not the last part of this row, isPartial==true, otherwise isPartial == false. So if user don't setAllowPartialResults(true), isPartial should always be false.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)