hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15537) Add multi WAL support for AsyncFSWAL
Date Thu, 31 Mar 2016 04:29:25 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15219310#comment-15219310

stack commented on HBASE-15537:

[~busbey] Your opinion appreciated here.

A provider inside a provider sounds right -- it is the proper separation -- but not sure our
APIs as they are are amenable to cascading like this. Given it was Sean who did the first
cut at multi, my guess is that he considered this and probably has some better input than
I here.

Does this current patch work? If it does, would be worth trying a compare. Async might help
make better define the case for multiwal.

> Add multi WAL support for AsyncFSWAL
> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-15537
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15537
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>         Attachments: HBASE-15537.patch
> The multi WAL should not be bound with {{FSHLog}}.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message