hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15525) OutOfMemory could occur when using BoundedByteBufferPool during RPC bursts
Date Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:26:25 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218139#comment-15218139

stack commented on HBASE-15525:

bq. This is some thing I discussed with you offline some time back 

Sorry (smile).

bq. The max #BBs in the pool can be defined by customer. (Default to 2 * handlers)..

You know what I am going to say here (smile). So, overflow will be on to heap. Thats good.
If we give good feedback on effectiveness of offheap buffers and how much we are overflowing
to onheap, that'll help.

Going by diagram over in HBASE-15555, we'll have more than one use of this pool? Or if we
more than one use, we should allocate a new pool? Or if fixed size, then maybe should be one
pool only?

This is great. How will we test it? (What would you suggest [~dvdreddy])?

> OutOfMemory could occur when using BoundedByteBufferPool during RPC bursts
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-15525
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15525
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: IPC/RPC
>            Reporter: deepankar
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: WIP.patch
> After HBASE-13819 the system some times run out of direct memory whenever there is some
network congestion or some client side issues.
> This was because of pending RPCs in the RPCServer$Connection.responseQueue and since
all the responses in this queue hold a buffer for cellblock from BoundedByteBufferPool this
could takeup a lot of memory if the BoundedByteBufferPool's moving average settles down towards
a higher value 
> See the discussion here [HBASE-13819-comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13819?focusedCommentId=15207822&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15207822]

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message