hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yu Li (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15490) Two CompactionThroughputControllerFactory co-exist in branch-1
Date Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:39:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15202983#comment-15202983

Yu Li commented on HBASE-15490:

>From the [test report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1089/testReport/]
we could see the only failed UT case is {{TestFailedAppendAndSync#testLockupAroundBadAssignSync}},
which is tracked by HBASE-15307 and irrelative to the change here (also confirmed it could
pass in local).

Will commit the patch after review.

> Two CompactionThroughputControllerFactory co-exist in branch-1
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-15490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15490
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>         Attachments: HBASE-15490.branch-1.patch, HBASE-15490.patch
> Currently there're two {{CompactionThroughputControllerFactory}} in our branch-1 code
base (one in {{o.a.h.h.regionserver.compactions}} package, the other in {{o.a.h.h.regionserver.throttle}})
and both are in use.
> This is a regression of HBASE-14969 and only exists in branch-1. We should remove the
one  in {{o.a.h.h.regionserver.compactions}}, and change the default compaction throughput
controller back to {{NoLimitThroughputController}} to keep compatible with previous branch-1
> Thanks [~ghelmling] for pointing out the issue.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message