hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Phil Yang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15398) Cells loss or disorder when using family essential filter and partial scanning protocol
Date Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:19:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15197600#comment-15197600

Phil Yang commented on HBASE-15398:

I checked all filters we offer to users. There is no filter which will use joinedHeap and
hasFilterRow return false. So currently there is no filter will be banned. For user-defined
filters using joinedHeap, we may warn users must return true in hasFilterRow to disable partial
protocol to prevent being banned? 
Another option is we disable partial protocol directly when filter uses joinedHeap since we
will do this when hasFilterRow return true. 

Which one is better? Or any other options?

> Cells loss or disorder when using family essential filter and partial scanning protocol
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-15398
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15398
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dataloss, Scanners
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.1.3
>            Reporter: Phil Yang
>            Assignee: Phil Yang
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: 15398-test.txt, HBASE-15398-v2.patch, HBASE-15398-v3.patch, HBASE-15398-v4.patch,
> In RegionScannerImpl, we have two heaps, storeHeap and joinedHeap. If we have a filter
and it doesn't apply to all cf, the stores whose families needn't be  filtered will be in
joinedHeap. We scan storeHeap first, then joinedHeap, and merge the results and sort and return
to client. We need sort because the order of Cell is rowkey/cf/cq/ts and a smaller cf may
be in the joinedHeap.
> However, after HBASE-11544 we may transfer partial results when we get SIZE_LIMIT_REACHED_MID_ROW
or other similar states. We may return a larger cf first because it is in storeHeap and then
a smaller cf because it is in joinedHeap. Server won't hold all cells in a row and client
doesn't have a sorting logic. The order of cf in Result for user is wrong.
> And a more critical bug is, if we get a LIMIT_REACHED_MID_ROW on the last cell of a row
in storeHeap, we will break scanning in RegionScannerImpl and in populateResult we will change
the state to SIZE_LIMIT_REACHED because next peeked cell is next row. But this is only the
last cell of one and we have two... And SIZE_LIMIT_REACHED means this Result is not partial
(by ScannerContext.partialResultFormed), client will see it and merge them and return to user
with losing data of joinedHeap. On next scan we will read next row of storeHeap and joinedHeap
is forgotten and never be read...

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message